Parliament of the World’s Religions Reaches Out

Paul Chafee writes of the history and continuing development of the Parliament of the World’s Religions, touching on its outward orientation, ties to the United Religions Initiative, and new efforts such as the Goldin Institute.

By Paul Chafee
Director, Interfaith Center at the Presidio

November 11, 2003

In 1893 the first Parliament of the World’s Religions offered Buddhists,

Christians, Jains, Jews, and Hindus a shared public forum for the first time

in history. Part of a World Exposition, the Parliament commenced a week of interfaith

dialogue on September 11. Twelve thousand and more came each day to the building

that would become the Chicago Art Institute. Swami Vivakananda, a Hindu who

arrived initially without invitation, and then was embraced, particularly electrified

the public forums. His charisma, intellect, and generous heart repeatedly challenged

the assumption (held by most of the Parliament’s planners) that Christianity

has a lock on the love of God and could “perfect” whatever goodness

and wisdom other religions brought to the table.

The crowd rose to its feet to greet this monk in bright saffron robes as soon

as he began with the words, ?Sisters and brothers of America??

After the opening speeches, Swamiji was scheduled by the organizers to conclude

each day’s sessions, a strategy for keeping everyone in attendance. One

can note from his first words that Vivakananda (like the movement he helped

inspire) is not a syncretist. “The Christian is not to become a Hindu

or a Buddhist, nor a Hindu or a Buddhist to become a Christian. But each must

assimilate the spirit of the others and yet preserve his individuality and grow

according to his own law of growth,” he said in Chicago. He compared the

love of God flowing through different religions to rivers all headed towards

the sea. He quarreled with the notion that any religion can claim exclusive

franchise on the divine, and he sought friendship and common cause among people

from all traditions.

A centennial celebration of that first event made its own history in 1993 when

8,000 people from dozens of different religious traditions again came to Chicago.

Subsequently a momentous decision was made to sponsor similarly ambitious gatherings

every five years or so, at sites all around the world.

The Council for a Parliament of the World’s Religions (CPWR) made good

on that commitment in 1999 in Cape Town, South Africa. As in Chicago, the experience

of attending a Parliament was of homecoming, of meeting members in “our family” we never knew about. In this setting new friends very quickly

become dear and important to each other. The “love of God” shines

through, regardless of tradition, inviting your own to shine back. Nelson Mandela

in great detail told the 7,000 assembled in 1999 how the struggle against Apartheid

have failed without various kinds of help that Christian, Hindu, Jewish, and

Muslim communities each offered to those who suffered the most in those years

of terror. From the bottom of his heart to ours, he let us share the ownership

of their victory and South Africa’s freedom today. For a moment you could

see the whole human family in one room, safe with each other.

You can already register (and save a pretty penny by being early) for the Parliament

being held July 7-13, 2004 in Barcelona, Spain (www.cpwr.org). As plans go forward,

the 1993 hundred-year-old birthday party for interfaith dialogue is morphing

into an interfaith movement, engaging activists in every country in the world.

Some few have had the opportunity to attend one of the Parliaments. But millions

of people in countries everywhere, in villages as in cities, are becoming engaged

in a similar, emerging grassroots interfaith community.

New developments

Anyone disappointed by the failure of the 21st century to quickly usher in

a new era of peace can at least take comfort and a ray of hope from recent developments

in the nascent interfaith movement. The Parliament is alive and well and developing

its relationship with another international grassroots effort, the United Religions

Initiative (URI). URI, which in two years has established nearly 200 Cooperation

Circles in 36 countries, in August held its first post-Charter-signing Global

Assembly in Rio de Janeiro (Cf. United Religions Initiative Comes of Age in Rio). URI’s

Charter had been signed in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 2000, and those who

came to Rio were finally able to turn to the multitude of issues they care about,

their Charter a foundation now rather than a work-in-progress.

Back in Chicago, a similarly significant development is opening a new chapter

in the Parliament’s life. This past October the curtain went up on what

CPWR has been doing in its own backyard for the last 15 years. From the start,

Parliament planners have been “local grown,” leaders from Chicago’s

multitudinous faith communities, clergy and laity who cooperatively opened the

door to all people of faith and practice. The joy in their work comes from flourishing

local relationships.

So when the decision was made to continue the massive gatherings, it was grounded

with a parallel commitment to stay involved in grassroots interfaith organizing

in Chicago. Since the late eighties the Council for the Parliament, its decision-making

body, has been active in the city and its suburbs, involving itself with dozens

of religious organizations, universities and seminaries, private and civic organizations,

in addition to various interfaith groups. Special attention over the years has

been invested in a neighborhood called Rogers Park, a quick drive from downtown

Chicago. Simply reading the signs over the storefronts when you walk down Rogers

Park’s main business corridor makes Chicago’s ethnic, racial, religious

diversity astonishingly clear — the globe in a single neighborhood.

For years the Council’s leadership has ruminated on how its extensive

Chicago activities should relate to the international gatherings it sponsors

twice a decade. Instead of forcing the issue, they lived with it, continuing

to nurture both local and global ventures. A strategy has emerged now, suggesting

a local-global axis for the interfaith movement capable of empowering interreligious

work everywhere. The Golden Institute for International Partnership & Peace

was founded to give expression to the strategy. On October 26, at a quiet Dominican

priory just west of Chicago, 67 interfaith activists invited from around the

world gathered to hear a new dream of partnering between the global Parliament

gatherings and grassroots interfaith activities everywhere.

The Goldin Institute for International Partnership & Peace

Though born in Los Angeles, Diane Goldin brought her theatrical talents to

Chicago where a 17-year career as a producer garnered her high reputation for

multicultural approaches to the classical repertory. A life-long passion for

peace and justice led to her involvement with CPRW. Early in 2002 she made a

substantial donation to the Parliament for a five-year project called the Goldin

Institute. The Institute is dedicated to building “partnerships”

with grassroots interfaith communities everywhere who would like to have a formal

relationship with the group organizing the massive gatherings so many enjoyed

in Cape Town and will enjoy in Barcelona in the summer of 2004.

The weeklong Institute agenda was packed, leavened with long breaks and leisurely

meals. In short order, people had a chance to meet each other one-on-one for

an hour, and introduced each other in groups of eight. Then we went to work.

  • Professor Patrice Brodeur of Connecticut College set the pace in a challenging

    keynote about interfaith activities moving from the periphery to the center

    of the religious community-at-large and the need to study “applied religion.”

  • A day was spent on the increasingly important role of intrafaith relations

    (activities connecting different segments of a single tradition) if interfaith

    work is to have a significant influence in the world.

  • The Parliament’s many Chicago projects were surveyed. Through the week

    a dozen different religious and cultural sites in and near Chicago were visited,

    with dozens of stories about interfaith activities from people at each site.

    Gurdwara, church, synagogue, and mosque were all visited.

  • Participants from South Africa, the Middle East, Taiwan, and Brazil were

    given time to survey the considerable efforts going on in their organizations

    back home. At table and on buses the conversation never ceased, and the shear

    size of global grassroots activities started sinking in.

  • In one case, participants had to choose a day examining relations between

    Chicago’s Muslims and the rest of the community or interfaith activities

    on campus. Afterwards participants gave high marks to both options.

  • Visiting the spot where Vivekananda addressed the Parliament 109 years

    ago particularly moved long-timers in the interfaith vineyard. At the Chicago

    Art Institute we also visited the large room where “Towards a Global

    Ethic — An Initial Declaration” was debated and signed by 200

    religious leaders at the 1993 Parliament.

As Goldin Institute went into its fourth day, the Parliament?s dreams

for formal partnerships built around specific proposals and agreements were

detailed. Partnerships will mostly be with interfaith coalitions in cities around

the world, though smaller communities will also be welcomed in creating partnerships.

Time was scheduled for people to work in small groups and begin considering

what could be done in their own backyards that would benefit from a relationship

with CPWR. When time ran out, cards and email addresses were exchanged along

with promises to stay in touch.

The Possibilities Ahead

Grounding the dialogue at URI’s Global Assembly and the Parliament’s

Goldin Institute were some shared assumptions. Above all, collaboration is the

watchword today. Working together, relating across traditional turf boundaries,

sharing resources, cooperating rather than competing, integrated financial strategies

to fund a plenitude of grassroots efforts ? these themes came up over

and again, in Chicago as in Rio. Such sentiments are easy to mouth, but the

events themselves make the case. Dozens of those in Rio were Parliament alums

from 1993 and 1999, and two of the Parliament?s executive staff were full

participants at URI?s 2002 Assembly.

Similarly, nearly a third of the Goldin Institutes participants have been active

in URI activities, including four past and current URI Global Council trustees.

Growing out of collaboration, the phrase “capacity building” could

be heard over and over in both CPWR and URI settings. Some have wondered out

loud why we need more than one major grassroots international interfaith organization.

Those who feel that ending religiously motivated violence and creating cultures

of peace is actually critical to the human family’s survival quickly see

the efficacy in not two or three major interfaith organizations but many. On

the global stage, the interfaith movement is still working through day one or

two, and multiplying our aggregate capacity for generating mutual respect, peace,

and justice tops the collective agenda.

In a world darkened by conflict and turmoil, Goldin Institute participants

headed home with hope. The world we each live in had been enlarged with new

friends and the promise of creative partnerships for healing the world.

Leave a Reply